Browse by Subject
Browse by Category
ACQ 256, Services Acquisition Management Tools deployed today, 11 Feb 2019. This is a revised course based on ACQ255 that has been shortened to approximately 16 hours by moving the Cost Estimating module to CLM 006, Independent Government Cost Estimate for Services Acquisition.
Please be advised that you may still complete your current enrollment in the predecessor course (ACQ255) to satisfy training/certification requirements. However, it's recommended that you take ACQ 256 as the content relies heavily on the Service Acquisition Mall which recently moved. For ACQ 255, all required content must be completed prior to close of business on April 30, 2019.
If ACQ 255 remains incomplete on your transcript, your enrollment will be dropped with an attrition code of "Z" for "Other." You may register for the new ACQ 256 at your convenience. You may access the content of the new course from DAU's training center. Look for "Publically available course material."
To access the online learning environment, please login here:https://dau.csod.com/
CLM 006 is a three hour on line training course to help services acquisition team members to understand, develop and review an IGCE.
Cost estimates are necessary for many reasons: to support decisions about funding one program over another, to develop annual budget requests, to evaluate resource requirements at key decision points, and to develop performance measurement baselines. Do you need an Independent Government Cost Estimate? An IGCE is required for every services acquisition in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (SAT). You’ll need that IGCE to help defend your requirement at the Services Requirements Review Board (SRRB). Topics covered in CLM 006 include the current cost estimating and budgeting environment, cost estimating methods, the Acquisition Requirements Roadmap Tool—Cost Estimation (ARRT-CE), and an introduction to cost accounting.
The DoD Handbook for the Training and Development of the Services Acquisition Workforce recommends CLM 006 for the Functional Services Manager at Level I. More information is available on ARRT-CE as well as the Independent Government Cost Estimate (IGCE) Handbook for Services Acquisition on the Service Acquisition Mall
Annually GAO reports to Congress data concerning potest filings. This is Summarized in the table at the botom of this post. (Note: you can find the reports with a search of Bid Protests on the ACE for Services Community).
I find GAO's report of the most prevalent grounds for sustaining protests very useful. Of the protests resolved on the merits during fiscal year 2018, GAO sustained 15 percent of those protests.
GAO found that the most prevalent reasons for sustaining protests during the 2018 fiscal year were: (1) unreasonable technical evaluation; (2) unreasonable cost or price evaluation; (3) flawed selection decision.
In FY17, GAO reported as most prevalent reasons for sustaining a protest as: (1) unreasonable technical evaluation; (2) unreasonable past performance evaluation; (3) unreasonable cost or price evaluation; (4) inadequate documentation of the record; and (5) flawed selection decision.
So, #1, 2 and 3 in FY 18 were #1, #3 and #5 in FY17. Did we get better at documentation and past performance evaluations? How can we get better at avoiding protests due to those recurring top reasons?
Since 2014 the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) has increased the price of background investigations by 40 percent while wait times have tripled. In January, the Government Accountability Office added the Government-wide Personnel Security Clearance Process to its list of high-risk government programs and questioned whether NBIB (see https://nbib.opm.gov/) had an adequate plan to reduce the current backlog. Under a 21 June 2018 White House reorganization plan, the NBIB could be absorbed into the DoD. The Defense Security Service (DSS) is primed to take on responsibility for DoD personnel later this year and DSS is a logical DoD organization for the transfer of NBIB (yet to be approved by Congress).
Section 843 of the FY18 National Defense Authorization Act requires a number of elements affecting the Non-Acquisition Workforce in Services Acquisitions. One of the elements is what additional acquisition training is needed, what the positions are that need the training and what are the challenges in delivering this training. What do you think? What's your position and what acquisition training do you need? What are your challenges in getting this training?
Alert me of new conversations
Tip: Sign in and then click 'Join this community' to become a member of this site.
Demise of the Cloud; Rise of the EdgeJanuary 02, 2019 Interesting article on need for computing power between your personal device and the cloud storage...
Category: Electronics & Communications Services
Office of Technology Assessment (OTA) comeback in 2019, not the Other Transaction AuthorityDecember 10, 2018 An interesting FCW article on OTA appeared in my email and of course the link is blocked by US Cyber Command. You can access the article by going to the FCW website...
The SAW ToolNovember 08, 2018 Check out the newest DAU tool, the SAW Tool. No, it's not a tool to help you decide...